Alchemy on Hiring – the PASHA Career Expo Post 1
I am not exactly the role model for giving hiring advice since in my career to date I have only actively looked five times for a job.
a) Immediately after school at FAST ICS (four offers)
b) Four and a half years later when I was pissed at my boss for taking sides (one offer)
c) After graduating from Columbia Business School when I walked into an information session by Viant, then an upcoming and rising technology practice (two offers)
d) In 2001 when Avicena and the economy died together and no one was hiring (one offer)
e) And the last time in December 2002 when I got laid off from AnnuityNet, looked around and then decided to head back home to Pakistan (four offers).
This does not include the handful of times when clients primarily called up and said, why don’t you dump what you are doing and come work with us.
On the other side of the fence, I have now been hiring candidates and giving career advice for a decade and a half. Not much by any standard, but all in all, I have tested, interviewed, shortlisted and dissected close to a 1000 plus candidates here in Pakistan as well as in North America. Actuaries, MBA’s, computer scientists, English lit and math majors, interns, office help, nut jobs, whack jobs, assassins for hire… Been there done that.
This piece is just a rant about hiring that has been due for a very long time. Jehan, the PASHA Career Expo, our recent internal hiring exercise (150 plus candidates processed over three months), brought it to the fore front. Stick around, it will be fun.
What do great employees look for:
Greatness. Do you have any idea how boring, mundane and frustrating anonymity is? Or for that matter just being another, ordinary, common, group thinking individual. No great candidate wants to work for an unknown or mediocre shop or remain a nobody for any stretch of time.
The first question peers ask is where do you work? And if you need more than two sentences to explain who you work for and what you do for a living, your social desirability index drops down instantaneously. “I work for Alchemy” should be enough of an introduction. And it should be followed by “Wow, how did you get in? I hear their yield is less than 1%? Is it as whacky a place as people say it is?” Anything else is unworthy of your attention and/or respect.
But greatness is more than infamy. There are other attributes. A brilliant team that will push and challenge you beyond your personal best; High bandwidth problems that will open up areas of your neural map that you weren’t even aware existed; Giving you opportunities and space to meet your mountain and moving it; Winning. Making a difference and making it big.
Great candidates look for the shortest path to infamy. Simply because great candidate are suckers for RESPECT. It goes beyond egos and validation. There is no sense in being part of the top 1% if nobody knows or acknowledges you as part of that elite group.
An unfair deal. A great candidate doesn’t care about a fair deal for everyone. He only cares about himself. If I have just broken the benchmark for performance measurement do I really care that the average increment across the organization was 10% this year. Or that peer salaries in this group are 30% less than what I will accept as a starting offer. Or that you don’t share equity because it’s against your company policy.
Great candidates only care about producing above the benchmark and being fairly compensated for the value they have created. For most organizations this is an unfair deal since it breaks the benchmark.
Don’t get me wrong. A great candidate will wait, he will be patient, he will ask you nicely, but once he has produced and proven himself he needs to be compensated. He doesn’t care about money; he cares about a fair deal for himself. Whether it is fair or unfair to everyone else – that is just your mindset. And it’s not his problem, you need to fix your mindset, he is not going to reset his expectations.
For more on this read Ayn Rand’s The Fountain Head and Atlas shrugged in that order.
A problem with their name on it. I was born to build companies – that is a problem with my name on it. Put that problem in front of me and I will work for free for you for the first month or two, possibly even longer, maybe even as long as I can afford.
I was also born to build really intricate financial models – another problem with my name on it. I have done it for fifteen years and still do it for free. For people I really really like. Everyone else pays through their nose.
Great employees know the problem with their name on it. You put that in front of them, put them in a room with a few laptops, white boards, servers and feeding tubes and they will never come out again. You may have to kill them before they will let anyone else touch a problem with their name on it.
If you don’t know the problem with your name on it, you are not a great candidate.
What do Great Companies look for:
They look for great employees…
Â
PASHA Career Expo PDF Flier – Catch Alchemy at our booth in Karachi on 16th June 2007 at the PASHA Career Expo in Karachi.
June 14, 2007
Tags: Finding Great Talent, Hiring, Interviewing Posted in: Alchemy stuff, Desi Startup, Education










9 Responses
Excellent Post Jawwad — but do great candidates like this exist in the local market?
Yes they do. I have 30 of them working at Alchemy. I hired another 15 when I was at SHMA more than 10 years ago.
You just have to be patient and selective.
excellently put.
but tell me what if you have a work just waiting to be started you are short of time. how long do you wait for the great candidate. or in other words do you risk losing the work which you know a mediocre one can do maybe will take a little longer but will do.
The Contrarian View » The Lootmaar Blog - June 30, 2007
[...] ps2. Local companies CAN hire top notch talent. Read how. [...]
Desi Back to desh » Have fire, will travel or Why you should listen to your heart - July 1, 2007
[...] Category B are the restless ones. These are the ones who dream with their eyes open. I specially remember a 21 year old who on the first day of my class on bootstrapping new ventures told me, “let’s just say, I dream bigger dreams” (low blow Adnan, low blow). This is the group that knows that the Matrix will never be fair to them and they have to build their own world, on their own terms. I call these kids, the reality dysfunction brigade, the unfair deal, the have fire, will travel kids. [...]
Desi Back to desh » Another day, another year, another deal - II - December 21, 2007
[...] We still don’t advertise on traditional media except for the occasional once in six months posts on GOF and the “We are hiring” fliers at FAST, CBM and IBA. And when great candidates walk in, there must be something we have been doing right on the list of things that they look for. [...]
Talent ,Technology, Management | Desi Back to desh - January 23, 2010
[...] ,Technology, Management Ages ago for an upcoming PASHA career expo I did a piece on hiring. A few months earlier I had done a presentation on knowledge workers at Zayed University Campus in [...]
I do agree with you that these great employees are never eager to inquire that what their peers are getting instead they achieve without counting and later expects something less than the countless. In fact when I heard about you, I found something against the norms but convincing; and concluded that I can learn something from you since then I tracked your breaking-the-norms publications and speeches. I also got a chance, a couple of years back just after starting my career, to be interviewed by you and collected feedback from some other candidates as well.
What I safely concluded is that your selection approach is great but not foolproof, sorry to say. To be in front of your panel, one should be prepared with properly comprehended paragraph, having ability to express her ambitions, if she has. Please excuse me when I say that to be hired by you, one must have enough confidence and proper communication skills to be able to justify in you own jargon that he’s compliant with what you mentioned above.
While with my scarce experience and observation –nothing to compare with yours– I try to approach the hidden talent of the candidate, which is hidden under the fabrication. That’s why I, instead of accompanying my whole team in order to invade the confused and shaky candidate with parallel questions, meet her in person and encourage her to get out of her shell.
I agree that a sound confidence with proper impromptu communication skills, is critical for some specific roles but not for every
role. Are you willing to lose a good, selfmade, passionate scientist just because he’s lacking confidence or even has a personality
disorder and couldn’t deliver an impromptu speech. At least I will not go for it since some of my best technical resources were sweating during their 1st session. I refused some overestimated people, confident and well prepared, starting from buzzwords like self-esteem and actualization, fabricating their personality with ambitious dialogs and selected some under estimated people, lacking skills, required to express their professional attitude and ethics, having a record of doing something extra-ordinary in an ordinary environment.
I hope you’ll not mind it since I have to learn from you a lot.
Dear Catalyst.
Thank you very much for your very softly put reactions to our interview process.
I think I need to stand up and say that we got something right and we got somethings wrong and we have possibly gotten things wrong more often than not.
We made a number of exceptions to the process over the last seven years when a candidate did very well in the tests but triggered a red flag in the interview process or the otherway round. Most exceptions worked out some didn’t but all in all we have been extremely blessed with the type of individuals who come and work with us as well as come and interview with us. A number of times when things don’t work out, it doesn’t mean that there is an issue with the candidate in most cases it means that we are possibly not a good fit for each other. I hope that helps.
Once again thank you for taking out the time to share your thoughts.
Leave a Reply